Search results
1 – 3 of 3Sjur Larsen, Espen Nystad and Claire Taylor
To present a case study of coordination mechanisms employed by a multiteam system (MTS) charged in an international oil and gas company.
Abstract
Purpose
To present a case study of coordination mechanisms employed by a multiteam system (MTS) charged in an international oil and gas company.
Design/methodology/approach
Qualitative method with longitudinal observation and interviewing.
Findings
The MTS, and particularly its coordination mechanism of a regular collaboration meeting, provided multiple benefits, such as access to diverse competences, capabilities for solving problems crossing team boundaries, and opportunities for developing relationships between the different teams involved. There were also observed challenges: a lack of shared understanding between the participants concerning the purpose of the main collaboration session of the MTS, different levels of insight into each other’s areas of competence, information sharing, shifting team membership, multiteam membership, time pressure, and technology-mediated communication.
Originality/value
Providing an illustration of the MTS concept in a real organizational setting and the role of a regular collaboration meeting as a coordination mechanism for the MTS.
Details
Keywords
Sjur Børve, Tuomas Ahola, Bjorn Andersen and Wenche Aarseth
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate to which extent partnering practices observed in earlier research focussing on the construction industry are applied in offshore…
Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate to which extent partnering practices observed in earlier research focussing on the construction industry are applied in offshore development drilling projects.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper reviews earlier research on project partnering and the relationship-based procurement (RBP) taxonomy. The taxonomy is then empirically applied to describe partnering practices in an incentive-based drilling project in Norway.
Findings
Many elements of project partnering observed earlier in construction projects were found to characterize offshore development drilling projects. However, as assessed using the RBP framework, the authors found that partnering elements in observed context rated consistently lower than elements previously reported in the construction industry, indicating a lower maturity of partnering practices in the studied context.
Practical implications
The present study provides a multi-dimensional and systematic description of partnering practices in offshore drilling projects. Project owners can utilize this information to identify partnering elements requiring particular emphasis when initiating and managing drilling projects. Based on the findings, such elements include transparency and open-book auditing, integrated risk mitigation and insurance practices and establishment of authentic leadership. The findings further imply that partnering models cannot be directly applied across industry boundaries but must be tailored to fit the salient characteristics of each context.
Originality/value
The paper systematically describes to which extent specific partnering elements of the RBP taxonomy are applied in offshore drilling projects.
Details